Gods who missed their rendezvous
with history A lot of people were
active with religion without giving their name to that religion. Like Jesus or
Buda, some of us do know Manus who gave the Manichaeism or Jan Huss with his
Jansenism or Nestor. Nestor still can be found for minor parts in Iraq. All Gods are
originally from Royal origin and became from Half God and by take over to God. Christianity
inherits her name from the Greek word chestos. Chrestos is the translation from
the Hebrew word “Messie” (salved). In fact we don’t know of Jesus wanted to
establish a religion or a church. I am of the opinion that He as leader of the
resistance against the Romans, as Jew not in was for schism. It is Paul who should carry the laurels in
the spirit of Paulinism as name for the present Christianity. Jesus, Buda and Paul
too were princes. Jesus is from the House of Dave; in France we should say Orléanist or
legitimist. A part of which had not the
power of authority, they were from Royal origin and rich. Paul is the grandchild
of Herod, with properties and money deserving the status prince. Did Paul miss his
objective? Let’s analyse more the motivating of this adventurer. Paul is originally
offspring from Herod. This family is far from Jewish and is Idumeniëens or
Nabatiëens. Nowadays we say Arab or Bedouin.
They marry amongst each other but once a while a beautiful Jewess is in
the harem of this king and master of Israel. Paul was according
Historians ¾ Arab and ¼ Jew. His education is like all princes; Latin, Greek Rhetoric,
religious education by the important Jewish philosopher Gamaliel (passed away
in 10 AC). Paul can be compared with Mohammed and Zoroaster both founders of
religions but never became God or even Half God. They remained Saint or prophet
and in our case apostle. Without being faraway a God and still why is it
important to write a chapter about Paul? This is very simple, because without the existence of
Paul I would not have written all these sentences of this book or website. Even
the name of Jesus would not have been known and the Islam would not have been
there. Thousands of books exist about Paul and it is not my intention to write
1001. I only want to summarize a couple of sentences written by historians who
were not in the straitjacket of the religion. It will not give an absolute
objectivity, but it is without the very heavy ecclesiastical coat. As said before Paul
is born in a royal family and grand child of Herod. His father was murdered by
his grand father this by political reasons or in other word he was not pro
Herod. It happened in 4 BC. His name of birth is Saul. From his youth we don’t
know so much only the fact that he is raised with Herod, the tetrarch and
Costobar. According Messadié he was raised by an aunt in the city Tarsus. A possible
explanation; as a lot of others about his life, is reconstructed with
allusions, silence, double check, apocrypha, canon texts and in a certain way
corrected with the wording of the New Testament. With his brother
Costobar he goes in the army and is in service as officer for the temple
militia. Flavius Joseph does
not have any good word for this terrorist, holding raids and plunders and the
holy texts about this period are not very gentle. But they say that he is
raised with Herod the tetrarch. Even Lucas confirms these facts and does not
blur these misbehaviours in this dark period. After this we get
the murderer on St. Etienne. Paul washes his hands in innocence and says that
he was too young to do such kind of things…. He is a liar!! Thereafter he started
to chase the Zealots up till Damascus, Damascus became a base
with militants for liberty and other type of militants. Damascus is not under the control of the
Tetrarchs and King Arétas. This king realizes that Paul is trying to conquer
his territory with paid soldiers; Paul gets his lessons back by an overthrow. Messadié is of the
opinion that Paul came to this by his own free willingness, but in this case I
do not understand the pursuit of Paul. According the holy books Paul was hit by
the lightening and thrown of his horse and he became blind for a certain
period. This spiritual
happening is not very clear for me. In good logic he should have been captured by
Arétas, but in the opposite he becomes a hostage of the partisans, the zealots,
and the people he was chasing after. In fact is Paul or
Saul (his name by birth) in the hands of Annanias. Here manifests the
syndrome of Stockholm,
in other terms hostages are going to use the words which are used by the
persons who keeping the hostages.It is for sure that
Paul had nothing to loose. Captured by Arétas and released with ransom as usual
in these countries and still nowadays it is. But at the end the Zealots helped
him to escape in basket over the fort walls of Damascus. This after he was reformed to their
idols, inspirited by a martyr and leader of the resistance with the name Jesus. We are not yet with
the Christians; this is much later when Paul becomes Lord and Master of this sect. The escape in a basket made of marsh grass via
the walls of Damascus,
as pencilled in the etching here below. The text is written in Greek and a
basket is called ταρός and is
the same names as the city Tarsos. Paul says that originally he comes
from the city Tarse. This game with words is not quite un-fundamental, because
the new spiritual life from Paul starts here with this happening. In fact we
have to read the nickname “Paul from the basket” and certainly not that he
originally comes from Tarse. We still have in Turkey the city Tarse. It is not
impossible that he lived during his youth in Tarse, but there is an absolute
stillness about this period before he was reformed to Jesus. We can not be sure
that this was the city were he was born.
Paul comes back in
the Holy Land and he gets a mission to do on the island Cyprus together with a buddy with
the name Barnabas, this to kill the Roman governor. In this way our brand new
reformant is accessory and caused by this he can not go back. The operation
fails in certain way, because the prefect becomes “just” blind. I have to say,
at least much better than our prefect of Corsica
with three bullets in his back and final shot at the end. The meaning of the
name Barnabas is “Son of the comforter” and is probably the son of Ménahem “the
comforter”, nephew and successor of Jesus in the fight against the Romans. From now on our
missionary starts to reform the “Gentils” (this are the non-Jews) and his sect
is doing well, because Paul knows how to open doors. He receives a lot of money
and asks Pete the right to baptise. It would have been much better that ask
Pete better questions. Because he gets the blame that he only wants to buys
with his wealth sacramental stuff. Here
we see in the Bible the appearance of a couple of obscure persons under the
name Simon, but all can be tracked back to Paul. Buying of material of that
cult is still called “Simonie” By the person Simon
we learn that Paul bought a beautiful woman from a whorehouse keeper, who had a
lupanar in Tyr. Is it she who infected him, having the burnings in his body
like a thorn in his flesh. Do we have to look for the misogyny of the Christian
religion? According the holy
books Pete and Paul are in this period in a battle between life and death. Here
we see for instance a first aggression with the execution of Ananias, who kept
secret a part of the sale of his house in Damascus,
tiens tiens! Peter is the leader
of the interrogation; “it is not good to lie to me, you lie not only to me but
also to Jesus Christ himself” and he is beaten by the Holy Ghost and collapse
in front of the feet of Pete. The following hour
his wife Sephira is questioned by the same revolutional tribunal, and Pete asks
the same questions. She does not deny her husband with the consequence that the
“beating” Holy Ghost sends her to the hereafter this in front of this Holy
Apostle. In revolutionary
organisations they call it radicalisation and are very common and we even can
say systematic. Paul is also waylaid
by a couple of Jews in different period, who accuse him from blasphemy. Paul is
enabling to inform the prefect and gets a guard who protects him against the
agitated Jews. I am not surprised that those Jews are the partisans from Pete,
but all books keep silence about this and by the way Pete is already dead since
47 and we are in the year 50 with this affaire! Paul is sent to Cesarée
with a royal escort of at least 400 men and horses (very usual for a poor tent
builder originating from Tarse!) In Cesarée he is
welcomed by the “Gauleiter” Felix, to who he had given wife in the past, the
princes Drusula, sister of Bérenique. Voilà how we find the Herodian family
back again. Those sex bombs are the nieces for our friend Paul.
You only have to read the texts when Herod Agrippa II Paul visits as
“prisoner” from Felix. A lot of information is wrong in the New Testament,
except the endless dispute from Paul. This is pure a product from our Church
fathers.
Felix keeps his prisoner
under house arrest as usual for every officer or important person and hopes to
get ransom. This is an indication that the hostage is rich. Paul does not
change his mind and the successor Festus, accepts the arbitration of the
emperor, Caesar Nero.Genius, voilà our
virus is sent directly to the heart of the imperial cell. In his letters he
welcomes the house of the Emperor! This trip to Rome is not without
interventions, because he got a shipwreck. We are in the year 60 the problems
started in 58 and at the end in 63 he is released by Burrus brother and
philosopher Séneca, teacher and adviser of Nero. Do you know what is
remarkable of all those writings and stories; Paul takes the opportunity during
his house arrest at least till 63 to change the complete political chess board
from a city that complete unknown is for him! He makes two voyages. The Holy
books don’t touch his trip to Spain,
where he has a military protection. You have to look at Galba, the governor
from Spain
with the intention to get rid of Nero. Certainly not to evangelise the Iberian
peninsular! In this late period Rome is put in fire and
the historians say it are the Christians who did it while they in the mean time
said it was the Emperor who did it. In parallel with
this facts, Séneca, Pétrone were forced to commit suicide a result of the
“conspiration of Psion” Paul succeeded to
escape from this revenge. Is it Paul who put Rome in fire together with some left friends?
Galba is far away from Rome
and we can not even think about him. Three years after
the fires Paul get caught in Troas (the old
Troy) and looses his head at approx. 71 years. I am not putting the
question on the table of Pete has accepted him in Heaven, because Pete was
already executing this job for 20 year. This in the place were we all will end
at the end, or almost everybody. These 7 years have
changed the world completely and it will not take long that Galba becomes the
emperor and will be killed after a couple of months of terror. Our Paul as royal
prince wanted to get hold of a function that deserved a status and position and
at the end he never has known or could imagine that he had built a spiritual
empire with a dimension that never had happened since humanity. Viarmes 18-12-01 |